It's called photofstopdyslexia.
Tom C. >From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: Pentax FA28/2.8 AL vs FA35/2 AL lenses: how do they compare? >Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:10:58 -0800 > >You're welcome, Pancho. > >Why do you write the lens name reversed from how nearly everyone else >writes it? >The full lens name is "smc Pentax-FA 28mm f/2.8 AL" normally >shortened to FA28/2.8 ... >FA 2.8/28 is confusing. > > From what I've heard, the A28/2 is a fine performer, but I have only >heard that from the three people I know who've had one. I've been >trying to find one for two years unsuccessfully. > >Godfrey > >On Jan 25, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Pancho Hasselbach wrote: > > > Thanks for sharing, Godfrey. > > > > Just put hands on an FA 2.8/28, from a seller offering one on ebay, > > from > > which I know he also runs an online shop, often with really similar > > offers. > > > > BTW, does anybody know how A 2/28 performs, as well on film as on > > silicon? Stan's site says nothing about it, it seems to be very > > uncommon. > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
