Actually, it was labeled as the DCS no number, people started referring to it as the DSC-100 after the DSC-200 replaced it. It was a whopping 1.3MP camera with, you guessed it, a 1.5x sensor just like your pentax.
Adam Maas wrote: > Nope, > > The first DSLR (Kodak DCS100 based on the F3HP) was introduced > commercially in 1991. > > The first 35mm camera with IS (A Nikon VR P&S, can't recall the model) > was introduced 3 years later in 1994. Canon IS lenses would show up a > year later in the form of the craptacular 75-300 IS USM. The first > really useful IS lens was introduced in 1997 (300 f4L IS USM) and the > super teles would show up in 1999, same year as Nikon's D1, which began > the modern era of DSLR's and the end of the early Kodak DSLR era. > > Canon's first in-house DSLR, the D30, showed up less than a year after > the introduction of the full-line of IS Super-Teles. Kodak did make a EF > mount DSLR prior to that, in fact the Canon mount DCS-1 was introduced > the same year as the 75-300 IS USM lens(1995). > > -Adam > > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: >> I think you guys are forgetting the fact that Canon introduced >> IS ("in-lenses") long before DSLRs even existed and you cant even >> do "in-body" image stabilization with film cameras. So there >> was NO debate at the time which was better, "in-lenses" was >> infinately better at the time, because "in-body" was impossible >> with film cameras. Cut them a little slack, huh? >> jco >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >> K.Takeshita >> Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 9:00 AM >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Subject: Re: Camera based SR vs. lens based IS? >> >> >> On 1/28/07 8:41 AM, "Cory Papenfuss", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> I think Canon is going to have to eat their hat WRT in-body SR. >> "Rumour" says that's exactly what Canon is contemplating. Who knows? >> But it indicates that both methods are toss-up. Canon can no longer >> charge high price for IS lenses for sure. >> >>> They may be able to fake it by making a cheapie kit lens with IS, but >>> I think the market will desire in-body SR. >> Again, "rumour" says that this is the approach Nikon is contemplating, >> i.e., trickling down their VR onto even cheaper lenses. >> >> Ken >> >> > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net