At 06:27 AM 6/02/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > From: "Jens Bladt" > > Darned - I do lots of ISO 3200 shots. I don't like flash photography a > > lot. Not pretty - and it disturbs the "subject" a lot. Sometimes so > > much, I > > cant take pictures. I guess I could underexpose by one stop. If I > > shoot Raw)DGN > > it's probably OK to brighten up later. > >Whatever did you do when you were shooting with 35mm film? Any color >film over ASA 800 is pretty much crap, and even ASA 400 is crap when >you get to an 11x14 inch print.
What has film got to do with the K10D's lack of ISO 3200? I can appreciate that in certain situations the advantages of having ISO 3200 available outweigh it's disadvantages. I've taken very usable & printable ISO 1600/3200 shots with the *istD (after some creative use of noise reduction) & I've taken pictures at ISO 1600 on the K10D that no amount of noise reduction could help. Different strokes & all that. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
