On Feb 8, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote: >>> All of my comments made in this thread regarding >>> APS and FF lenses (legacy?) were optical quality related >>> to format (sensor) size, not feature set >>> issues. That is another unrelated matter altogether. >> >> Bullshit. It's part and parcel of what the lens can do. >> > So, without consideration of operator error, what exactly does a > new lens' feature set do to improve the resultant picture quality? > The > improved contrast of having autofocus? The increase of sharpness > due to > not having an auto-aperture? Bullshit. > > If you're too damn lazy to use manual lenses, just say it. It has > nothing to do with picture quality, except in the context of operator > error/incompetence/laziness.
Bullshit seems to be the word this morning. If you want to buy a camera and take advantage of half of what you paid for by using old lenses on it, that's your choice. No question that you can do some nice work if you know what you're doing. But calling someone who wants to take advantage of pattern evaluative metering, linked AE and focus point, MTF prioritized exposure metering, automatic recognition of lens focal length for image stabilization, improved flare control, better image resolution, high speed/accuracy focusing with fine manual control, etc etc, lazy or incompetent is truly bullshit. All these things can add up to improved picture quality when exploited to advantage. For either an amateur or a professional photographer too. There's no doubt that high quality photographs do not *require* all these capabilities, but they can help. You seem to always want to choose doing things the hardest way, Corey. I don't see any evidence that your choice poses an advantage. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
