I like this as well. Again, I didn't see the earlier version. Excellent detail. I might reduce overall brightness a small amount and perhaps burn in the light parts of the head. I don't think the highlights on the head are the result of oversharpening. If it was oversharpened, we'd be seeing artifacts in other areas. Paul On Feb 11, 2007, at 12:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 2/11/2007 9:42:56 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Couple of issues - the image is a little large to be viewed without >> scrolling. This takes away from the impact. You might consider a >> smaller image size or offer multiple image sizes. Also, it seems >> rather grainy - something that could be fixed perhaps. Lastly, it >> seems overexposed. The white on it's head seems blown out and >> the overall rendering just looks washed out. > > Hi Bruce > > Slight edit, better? > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5582064 > > John > > =========== > Didn't see the first, but not bad at all. Head looks a tad > oversharpened, > but I may be unclear on what the white specks are. Nice shot. Like > the stuff it > is sitting on. > > Marnie aka Doe :-) > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
