On 2/13/07, John Whittingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dave > > Ooops try again! > > > They're both a little too blue/cool IMO. With a levels adjustment > > layer and individually working on the R,G & B channels I came up with > > this (I hope you don't mind): > > > > <http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/5582064-md_DSv.jpg> > > Took your advice on levels aboard and adjusted a little: > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5582064 > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5586820 > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5586922 > > I think they're getting their IMHO
I think your right. > > > I also ran it through PS CS2's reduce noise filter & then smart > > sharpened it some. > > I found Noise Ninja produces a better rendering to my eye, just an opinion. > Thanks for the advice and constructive critique. I agree, Noise Ninja & Neat Image (prefer NN) are vastly superior, but the reduce noise filter is handy at times. I particularly like it for smoothing out skin texture in those shots of the dermally challenged. ;-) Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
