You expect the Congress to do nothing. We should consider ourselves lucky if they just accidentally screw things up.
Bob Shell wrote: > On Mar 11, 2007, at 12:32 PM, graywolf wrote: > > >> Here (NC) DST is a help, in Indiana, Michigan, etc it is a bummer. >> Kids >> waiting on the bus in the dark, etc. Of course Indiana, being >> sensible, >> makes it optional. >> >> For those who do not know, they moved it up to this morning, 2-3 weeks >> earlier than it has been in the past. So (US people) set your clocks >> ahead, if you have not already done so. >> > > Several years ago I bought two of those "Atomic" clocks, one for my > house and one for my studio. They set themselves based on a radio > signal from the National Atomic Clock. One attraction was that they > automatically set themselves for DST when it started and back to > standard time when it ended. Apparently the National Atomic Clock > wasn't told about the change, since neither of my clocks reset itself > this morning and I had to manually reset them. They've corrected for > the changes automatically for four years before. How much do you > wanna bet that they will reset themselves on April 1 ??!! > > This is another case of where the US Congress should have just done > what it does best --- absolutely nothing. > > Personally, I favor abolishing DST completely. > > Bob ( who has about forty-eleven clocks and watches around that must > now be reset!) > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
