One of the features I liked in RSP was that the auto function usually gave me a very good starting point. In Lightroom I find it totally useless.
Tim Typo Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Maurer Sent: 10. mars 2007 22:55 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: RE: Boris (PESO) - week 10 But the auto settings in Photoshop are never so much off as the auto setting in lightroom and some of them work quite often well for me. Lightroom overexposed so much, there can't be any deep analysis at all and I think it's one of the things they have to correct for the next version. greetings Markus -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 10:42 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Boris (PESO) - week 10 Auto adjustment functions try to analyze the scene and apply appropriate adjustment parameters. I have only rarely found they work to my satisfaction on anything other than very "standard" types of scenes, if even then, with any image processing tools. I develop my own defaults in both Camera Raw and Lightroom, have them applied on import. Godfrey On Mar 10, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Markus Maurer wrote: > Hi Boris > when I looked at the Beta the "auto" function was nearly useless and > overexposed heavily. Of course manual settings work well. > ACR seems to overexpose less but a bit too for my taste in auto mode, > anybody knows why? > What is your experience with Ligthroom? > greetings -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
