why not? those lenses were never expensive
and a APS version would be less costly to
make than a FF version of same quality or
better quality for same cost of the FF version.
jco
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thibouille
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 5:09 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The DA 50~200


yeah and sell it for the price they sell this 50-200 ? LOL

2007/3/14, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jeez, you would think they could at least do
> F4 constant in the reduced APS format like they have
> done in the past on FF 35mm format many times.
> jco
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Bruce Dayton
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 3:33 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: The DA 50~200
>
>
> I have resisted buying it so far.  I would prefer a better build 
> quality and a faster (constant) lens.  It appears to be very good for 
> the price. My take is optical quality is better than expected for the 
> price point, but build quality is consumer level.
>
> --
> Bruce
>
>
> Wednesday, March 14, 2007, 9:09:54 AM, you wrote:
>
> SB> Is the 50-200 supposed to be a "consumer" zoom - i.e., designed 
> SB> more
>
> SB> to a price point than the highest quality image?  For those who 
> SB> use the lens, are you pleased with it.  Paul, and a few others, 
> SB> seem to be quite happy with theirs, but what about those of you 
> SB> who don't often comment on such things?
>
>
> SB> Shel
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
----------------------
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to