absolutely correct.

mishka

On 3/15/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NOPE, magnification in macro or actually any
> photo, macro or otherwise, is the ratio of the actual object size
> to the lens image size of that actual object, PHOTOGRAPHIC "FORMAT" IS
> NOT A FACTOR WHATSOEVER in the magnification expression or calculation !
> ! !
> jco
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:37 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Macro Lenses
>
>
> Mishka,
>
> Magnification in macro work means the ratio of the size of the
> subject to the size of the format. 1:1 on a Pentax DSLR images a
> 16x24mm area.
>
> G
>
> On Mar 14, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Mishka wrote:
>
> > magnification on a digital sensor is a moot point anyway.
> > how do you measure it?
> > suppose you have 24x36mm (FF) sensors: one is 2x2 pixels
> > and one is 20MP. does it make any sense to compare 1:1 mag images made
>
> > on them?
> >
> > best,
> > mishka
> >
> > On 3/14/07, John Whittingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> But you still have to be at the same distance to achieve 1:1 or
> >> 1:2 as the
> >> case may be, fact! Again depends on the subject matter and whether
> >> you
> >> require a particular ratio for scientific or technical reasons.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to