Yes, that's a more elegant way of explaining it.
My only thought was that the original dents (stops) of the M & K lenses
were not precisely linear.  They didn't need to be.
Regards,  Bob S.

On 3/26/07, Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> As I understood it (but I may be wrong):
>
> * With A-lenses and A-bodies in A-mode, the body only pushes the lens
> lever the right amount to reach the right aperture, and that's why the
> lever's operation must be linear.
>
> * With pre-A bodies and/or pre-A lenses, the body actuator always pushes
> the lens lever all the way through, which results in the lens closing to
> the aperture preset on the ring. So it doesn't make any difference
> whether the lever effect is linear or not, in this case.
>
> This might explain why you could never see any difference.
>
> Regards
>
> Patrice
>
> Bob Sullivan a écrit :
> > [...]
> >
> > In practice, I've wondered about it, but never been able to notice any
> > difference in the slides my cameras produced with "A" vs K or M
> > lenses.  I always attributed any differenced to the light transmission
> > qualities of the lens itself.
> >
> > Regards,  Bob S.
> >
> > On 3/26/07, Igor Roshchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> Sorry for bringing up this question that may be known to most
> >> of the people here. I just realized that I don't know it, and couldn't
> >> find the information on the KMP site or elsewhere on the web.
> >>
> >> This question is about aperture control design.
> >> For the A and later lenses that have "A" setting on the aperture ring, -
> >> what is the step of the actual aperture setting in this mode?
> >> If it doesn't coinside with F-stops or 1/2-F-stops, then is it
> >> body-dependent (i.e. is one body more capable to utilize
> >> sub-1/2-f-stops then another) or is it standardized?
> >>
> >> I realize that the motion of the diaphragm actuator in the lens is
> >> stepless, so it is up to the body to choose the steps, if any
> >> (is it determined by the DAC bitness?)
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >>
> >> Igor
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> PDML@pdml.net
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to