What hubris ... Putting the pics on the web "ruins" them.
Shel > [Original Message] > From: J. C. O'Connell > I guess I didnt make this clear enough, I dont > do "lowest common denominator" web photos, if your > screen cant show them fully as I want them to be seen, > then you simply dont GET to see them. Even reducing > them to 800 pixels wide "ruins" them IHMO. > jco > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Celio > JCO, you may have a large screen or eyes that can handle super-high > resolution, but not everyone is so blessed. I, for instance, use my > laptop > for everything, and it has a 15.4" screen. I don't like having it set > to a > super-high resolution because that makes text too small to read > comfortably. > > Also, one of the first things I learned regarding webdesign is to set up > > your site so that the greatest number of people will be able to view it > comfortably. Since my website's stats show 1024x768 being the > most-often > used resolution by my visitors, I design for that resolution. If you > really > must have larger photos, just spend the time to make smaller versions > too. > You may consider it a waste of time, but you'll keep a lot more of your > visitors if you don't force them to have to scroll around every time > they > want to look at one of your photos. I only looked at a few of your > photos > (which were really nice, by the way. I love many of those cars) before > I > got tired of having to scroll every time and went on to something else. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
