screw you, I dont seek anything but the truth and the truth is anyone using old display resolutions shouldnt be complaining to me about how they find 1200 pixel images "frustrating", they should be fixing the "problem" on their end if their system is not up to the task of displaying these... My system which is neither state of art, nor expensive displays them fine...Reducing them in size is not the answer in my opinion because the COST in reduced image quality is too high.. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Sullivan Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:09 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: The PDML List Demographic and JCO Mark, I've had a peaceful and happy pdml experience since blocking JCO messages a month or two ago. Suggest you do the same. He seeks an audience. Regards, Bob S. On 4/3/07, Mark Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Let me ask again: > > Do you believe that your ALL CAPS RANTS and aggressive messages add > any value at all to the PDML? > > --Mark > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >ALL CAPS MEANS I AM PISSED OFF. > >If you actually read what is being said > >in the posts I am replying to > >you would understand. I dont > >start these things but people > >simply refuse to not get personal > >when they dont have to and they > >do it FIRST. I just reply in kind. > >Like calling me elitest schmuck because > >I use and recommend a much better > >screen setup even AFTER I told > >them it cost less than $200 NEW. > >Thats really not making any sense > >whatsoever. Its a personal attack > >to attempt to win a losing argument, > >plain and simple... > > > >jco > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
