tee hee hee

-Brendan
--- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Obviously you don't care about web quality
> images.... you posted a size that 
> I don't have to scroll !
> When will you guys ever learn? <VBG>
> 
> Kenneth Waller
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Brendan MacRae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Subject: Re: Cheapskate Challenge
> 
> 
> > http://www.primelensphoto.com/peacock.jpg
> >
> > Captured in RAW, edited in iPhoto saved to jpg.
> >
> > K10D, Pentax-A 400mm f5.6, ISO800, f9.5, 1/60, Av
> > mode.
> >
> > Decent shot of the peacock next door, but I'm
> still
> > waiting for "the" shot. Trouble is, he doesn't
> venture
> > into the direct sun very often so staying in the
> shade
> > is keeping the lighting flat. Also, I've noticed
> > unacceptable chromatic aberration with the A 400mm
> > f5.6 wide open which is bothersome. So, I had to
> shoot
> > at a higher ISO to stop the lens down. I was
> surpirsed
> > that the shot was this sharp at 1/60 second even
> > though I was using the Wimberely Sidekick on my
> > tripod.
> >
> > Does anyone know for sure if the FA400mm f5.6 is
> free
> > (or virtually free) of CA wide open? If so, I
> might
> > swap mine out for one. Not being able to use this
> lens
> > wide open limits its usefullness.
> >
> > -Brendan
> > --- Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I've been thinking lately about the cost of doing
> >> photography and
> >> finishing photographs for web publication.  A
> >> recent, erm, thread got me
> >> steamed up enough to post this.  Basically, how
> much
> >> can you accomplish
> >> without spending any more money than it cost you
> to
> >> obtain your
> >> hardware?  First some assumptions and then the
> >> rules.
> >>
> >> Assumptions:
> >> 1.  You have access to a computer with an
> operating
> >> system installed and
> >> a connection to the Internet.  Said computer is
> >> capable of running photo
> >> editing software and displaying the images on a
> >> screen.
> >> 2.  You have access to a working digital camera
> or a
> >> scanner that you
> >> can connect to the computer.
> >>
> >> The rules:
> >> 1.  You can use the software that came with your
> >> computer.  Your
> >> computer probably came with an OS installed.  If
> it
> >> didn't, whatever OS
> >> is currently installed is fine.  OSX, Windows,
> >> Linux, whatever.  From
> >> what I understand, the Mac has some basic photo
> >> editing software
> >> installed by default.  Most Linux distros do,
> too.
> >> All of this is fine.
> >> 2.  You can use the software that came with your
> >> camera or scanner.  If
> >> you had to buy a third party application to get
> your
> >> scanner or camera
> >> to talk to your computer that's fine, too.
> >> 3.  Since most of us like to print photos from
> time
> >> to time, you can use
> >> the software that came with your printer.  In my
> >> case the Epson R320
> >> came with Elements 2.0, so that's allowed.
> >> 4.  You can use any freely available software,
> open
> >> source or
> >> otherwise.  e.g. - Irfanview, Lightzone for
> Linux,
> >> Picasa, the GIMP,
> >> etc.  Trial versions, software that watermarks
> your
> >> photos until you pay
> >> for the real thing, etc. are not allowed.  You
> >> should be able to use the
> >> software indefinitely (and legally, so no warez)
> >> without having to shell
> >> out extra cash.
> >>
> >> To sum up, if it came with your hardware, is
> >> absolutely necessary for
> >> operating your hardware, or is freely available
> (no
> >> strings attached)
> >> it's allowed.  Nothing else.
> >>
> >> Within these limitation try to produce something
> >> you're proud to call
> >> your own.  When discussing digital (or digitally
> >> scanned) photographs
> >> with someone who's never done it before, you
> should
> >> be able to show them
> >> the photo and say something like "All you need is
> >> your computer, your
> >> camera, and whatever software came with them."
> >>
> >> In an attempt to add some credibility to the
> >> challenge, I should state
> >> that I have submitted two photographs to the
> Pentax
> >> Gallery.  One of
> >> them was accepted.  I shot the photograph on a
> >> K100D, JPEG, and edited
> >> it with Picasa on a PC running Windows XP.  It
> was a
> >> PESO a few weeks
> >> ago and can be seen here:
> >>
> >
>
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5035527265195980162
> >>
> >> If you're interested in playing along, simply
> post a
> >> link to your
> >> photo(s) in a reply to this message, or mark it
> as a
> >> Cheapskate
> >> Challenge photo in a separate thread.  Let us
> know
> >> what software you
> >> used to process/edit the photo.  Compare it to
> the
> >> software you would
> >> normally use.  If you're not interested, I won't
> be
> >> offended.  If you
> >> think I need to revise the assumptions or rules
> >> please let me know.  If
> >> you think this is a ridiculous waste of time I'd
> >> like to hear about
> >> that, too.
> >>
> >> Have fun!
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Scott Loveless
> >> www.twosixteen.com
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. 
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to