Been true forever. Almost seemed the "oversharpened" hysteria actually influenced some to "oversoften".
Jack --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also wonder how it could look grainy, since it's a digital image > and doesn't have grain? No noise in the shadows. At least not on > these itty-bitty web images. I think that sharp images are now being > > critiqued as "oversharpened." Put away the magnifying glasses, boys. > Paul > On Apr 17, 2007, at 10:16 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote: > > > On 18/04/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Interesting comment, Maris. On what basis? I see no halo effect, > no > >> afterglow, no crispiness. Where do you see evidence of > >> oversharpening. Not trying to be argumentative, just curious. > > > > The contrast enhancement or the yellow filter and low-key quality > of > > the lighting in concert with the surface textures make it look > grainy > > and possibly over-sharpened. > > > > -- > > Rob Studdert > > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
