I did it wrong then so far by telling SR 77mm for a A 50mm macro and 42 for the 28mm? Did I overlook that in the manual or was it a simple stupid assumption from my side? Could anybody tell me if that misunderstanding (if it is) would make a difference in the effectiveness of shake reduction? Greetings Markus
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 3:36 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Two questions > --Setting SR with an A lens. Do you use the actual or the 1.5 FL. I > used the A 28 in Vegas for a few shots and set it at 28. At the optical focal length. It's a DSLR ... they've taken the focal length into consideration, not some ridiculous equivalence factor. > --Polerizers. Do you add EV to make up for the lost light or shoot > what the meter gives you.I used it a bit in Vegas and the +.3 shots > look good, even though the histogram was still quite a wasys from the > right.I used the Tav mode for 99% of shots. Asking as i rarely use > filters and i wound up bracketing a lot. Usually you can use what the meter says but polarizers can be funny... G -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
