I agree. The 645D isn't necessary. I think it was a trial balloon. Pentax will do much better if they focus on the APS-C DSLR market. Paul On May 9, 2007, at 9:37 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 10/05/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> A few years ago, many of us figured Pentax would never put a DSLR >> on the >> market. > > Their first DSLR was getting painfully overdue, if they hadn't they > would have been dead Canada Geese long before this. The 645D is not > necessary for their survival, in fact the whole concept is a white > elephant for a company of their size and market potential IMO. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
