Yes, the larger sensor would undoubtedly reduce noise somewhat, but I doubt 
that it could achieve the noise level the K10D at 800 when shooting at 3200 -- 
as asked for in this wish list.
Paul
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Just the 1.3x crop sensor would lead to better noise/high ISO performance.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Good list. I concur. Although I've never had a problem with banding with 
> > the 
> K10D. Also, the K10D already has a spot to store the IR remote in the battery 
> grip. I don't think you'd want to make the camera itself larger to 
> accommodate 
> this. But for those of us who have know problem with size and therefore use 
> the 
> grip, the remote caddy is a great feature. I don't know if the kind of high 
> ISO 
> low-noise performance you're asking for is currently possible, but it 
> certainly 
> wold be nice. I think there's always going to be a considerable tradeofff for 
> ISO 3200 speed. CMOS sensors don't seem to have much of a real advantage 
> there.
> > Paul
> >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > From: "Patrick Genovese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >   
> >> My wish list:
> >>
> >> 1. Faster and more accurate AF (I know it is a contradiction in terms
> >> but we know it is possible  err. dark side)
> >> 2. Adjustable AF settings ( a user should be able to correct
> >> back/front focusing)
> >> 3. Larger sensor (1.3 crop factor) but only if current DA lenses cover
> >> the 1.3 crop factor.  The reason for this is the physics... larger
> >> pixels => lower noise.
> >> 4. faster frame rate.... 5 to 8 fps and the frame rate should be
> >> adjustable.  ie low,,, 3, med 5, high 8.  8 May be overkill (at least
> >> for me) but it would be nice to have at least 5fps.
> >> 5. Quieter operation over all --- Quiter af motors quieter shutter /
> >> mirror mechanism.
> >> 6. Higher eyepoint on the viewfider... but don;t mess up the
> >> viewfinder the k10 finder is too nice to muck up.
> >> 7. Smarter AF modes... e.g nearest subject, track moving subject
> >> etc... Nikon have someting of the sort and it really works well.
> >> 8. A good anti reflective system for the screen that will allow better
> >> viewing under bright sunlight
> >> 9. Lower noise and higher iso... up to at least 3200.. I want iso3200
> >> with the sort of noise we currently get at around 640 -> 800.  A Cmos
> >> sensor may be the way to go in this respect.
> >> 10 DNG with compression out of the camera.
> >> 11. Dual Card Slots (SD) with the ability to write Raw on one and jpeg
> >> on the other.
> >> 12. Buttons for WB & ISO.... ie hold a button down and turn a control 
> >> wheel.
> >> 13. WB Setting display in viewfinder.
> >> 14. Better Write speeds to cards.
> >> 15. Separate AF Assist Lamp. (ie no need to popup flash)
> >> 16. Intervalometer accessible throught the menu. (IE TS110 cable
> >> release functions built into the firmware).  This should be easy.
> >> 17. Bundled IR Remote with a gizmo to keep it permanently attached in
> >> some way e.g. to the camera strap or the base of the camera.
> >> 18. Higher res 12->16mp but not at the expense of adding noise 10MP is
> >> fine for me.
> >> 19. Addon for wireless transfer to PC
> >> 20.  REMOVE ALL TRACES OF BANDING.... .... NOISE IS ACCEPTABLE BANDING IS 
> NOT.
> >> 21. An updated lens line up .... Fast primes and fast zooms.
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> PDML@pdml.net
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>     
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> -- 
> All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to