Why to keep Pentax compliant and not cause any further disruption to the smooth process of assimilation, of course. The last month has been very embarrassing, right now analysts are blaming the Pentax Board. But if a whole new Board comes to the same conclusion that the original board did, those same analysts will start looking for others to blame as well...
Joseph Tainter wrote: > I can't imagine Sparx has any intention to retain its shares. When an > equity firm pushes for a merger, it usually indicates that they plan to > cash out their shares. > Paul > > ----- > > I hope so. One thing doesn't add up, though: Why would Sparx insist on > the right to interview new appointees to the board if they are cashing out? > > Joe > > -- All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
