The question was largely rhetorical. :-)

Tom C.

>From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
>To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <pdml@pdml.net>
>Subject: RE: Rv: Don't shoot the messenger ;-)
>Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 20:29:33 +0100
>
> > If Pentax had been making money hand over fist since the
> > K100D and the K10D,
> > why do they have "limited resources"?
>
>nobody in their right mind is going to announce that they have
>unlimited resources for anything.
>
>--
>  Bob
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Tom C
> > Sent: 01 June 2007 17:06
> > To: pdml@pdml.net
> > Subject: RE: Rv: Don't shoot the messenger ;-)
> >
> > There's still a lot of mixed messages.  So who knows?
> >
> > Highly profitable DSLR's doesn't necessarily mean the kind of
> > camera you and
> > I want to buy.  Focusing it's "limited resources" are they
> > key words, IMO.
> >
> > If Pentax had been making money hand over fist since the
> > K100D and the K10D,
> > why do they have "limited resources"?
> >
> >
> > Tom C.
> >
> > >From: Jaume Lahuerta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
> > >To: pdml@pdml.net
> > >Subject: Rv: Don't shoot the messenger ;-)
> > >Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 08:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
> > >
> > >Yes, but when talking about full frame, there was always the
> > argument
> > >saying "there will be no FF because this means
> > 'professionals' and Pentax
> > >covers this segment with its MF line".
> > >
> > >So no 'professionals' anymore? No upgrade path if you want
> > to go beyond
> > >what APS-C sensors can offer (and what is supported by the
> > new line of
> > >K-mount lenses)?
> > >
> > >Jaume
> > >
> > >----- Mensaje reenviado ----
> > >De: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
> > >Enviado: viernes, 1 de junio, 2007 16:41:09
> > >Asunto: Re: Don't shoot the messenger ;-)
> > >
> > >Shoot the messenger? Sounds like good news to me: "A new
> > focus on highly
> > >profitable digital SLRs." The abandonment of the MF
> > development had become
> > >pretty much an obvious direction as time went on and as the
> > K digitals
> > >proved quite successful.
> > >Paul
> > >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > >From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >From "The Nikkei Business DailyJun/01/2007 10:06 GMT"
> > > >
> > > > "Hoya's Suzuki previously implied that a sell-off of the camera
> > > > business could be imminent, but he indicated otherwise at
> > the Thursday
> > > > press conference. "We can afford the camera operation if
> > we focus on
> > > > particular fields," he said."
> > > >
> > > > "Within Pentax, a project to bolster the camera operation
> > is quietly
> > > > under way with a new focus on highly profitable digital SLRs. To
> > > > concentrate its limited resources on most promising items, it
>will
> > > > freeze for the time being development of medium format digital
> > > > cameras, which tend to be costly. Meanwhile, it will rebuild its
> > > > compact digital camera operation by concentrating on
> > > > higher-performance models, among other measures."
> > > >
> > > > "Hoya will begin takeover proceedings in early June, at
> > which time the
> > > > real battle for survival will begin for Pentax's camera
> > operations."
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Rob Studdert
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>PDML@pdml.net
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to