Every time you plug a hole, an ingenious way is found around it.  Most 
non technical types believe the salesman.  Hadn't you noticed?

John Sessoms wrote:
> Well, it would seem then, employers are easily satisfied with pro-forma 
> compliance. I've yet to see one of these filters that can prevent 
> someone from getting to pornography if they really want to.
>
> OTOH, I have seen them block innocuous sites simply because the site 
> included the wrong word. And I have seen them block work related sites, 
> resulting in the Network Administrator having to do extra work to bypass 
> the filter for those necessary, work-related sites.
>
>   
>> From:
>> "P. J. Alling"
>>
>> No it satisfies, employers who don't want their employees looking at 
>> porn when they're supposed to be working.  That's what those filters 
>> are meant for, (plus a scary message that your attempt to access a 
>> forbidden site has been logged).  Personally I see no problem using it 
>> this way, you get paid at work to do things you wouldn't do otherwise, 
>> that's why it's called work.
>>
>> John Sessoms wrote:
>>     
>>> From:
>>> J
>>>
>>> Listen to this..Where my wife works, she was going to the page were 
>>> my photos are on photo.net www.photo.net/photos/pjjdxn  and she 
>>> received a ERROR which said: The following error was encountered,
>>> Access denied by Smartfilter: Forbidden, this page 
>>> www.photo.net/photos/pjjdxn is categorized as: Nudity
>>>
>>> AS you have seen before on the page there is no nudity at all on the 
>>> page, but yes their are nude photos are other people's pages, so I 
>>> guess they just decide to block it all............Joe     
>>>       
>> FWIW, the American Cancer Society is categorized the same way by 
>> "smartfilter", because they have "breasts".
>>
>> Not very smart at all, but it satisfies the religio-fascists who want 
>> to keep you barefoot and pregnant. 
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to