The Indians, (Native Americans to the PC crowd), practiced slash and 
burn agriculture.  There wasn't nearly that much Virgin Forest.

graywolf wrote:
> Because it needs to go through a couple of cycles before it is a purely 
> natural forest. The US has lots of what I call National Woodlots (National 
> Forests) that have been more or less allowed to grow wild for 50-100 years. 
> They are still just overgrowth and not a real forest. They never will be real 
> forests until the current stuff dies and a new cycle grows.
>
> Proud Lake State Park in Michigan has what is claimed to be the largest uncut 
> tract of softwood forest in the US. Even that tiny 65 acre patch is eerily 
> different than any regrown wood I have ever been in. When you think that 
> there was about a million square miles of that forest when the Europeans 
> arrived in North America, you begin to realize what has been lost.
>
> Of course a woodlot is better than not having any trees at all.
>
> graywolf
> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
> http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
> -----------------------------------
>
>
> AlunFoto wrote:
>   
>> Why would you need "several thousand years", Graywolf?
>>
>> Jostein
>>
>> 2007/7/3, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>     
>>> If you want forest to go back to the "untouched by man" state, it takes 
>>> several thousand years. What folks do not realize is that before the 
>>> development of metal tools the forests were man's unrelenting enemy slowly 
>>> taking over any cleared land.
>>>
>>> graywolf
>>> http://www.graywolfphoto.com
>>> http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
>>> "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
>>> -----------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>> AlunFoto wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> It puzzles me a bit that they claim "this resource cannot increase".
>>>> Certainly, if an area is left to itself for a couple of centuries...?
>>>>         
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>
>>>       
>>     
>
>   


-- 
All dogs have four legs; my cat has four legs. Therefore, my cat is a dog.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to