----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kenneth Waller"
Subject: Re: 300mm 2.8 AF: Sigma vs Pentax


> FWIW -
>
> I have the FA 300mm f4.5, Its a wonderful lens even if it doesn't have a
> tripod mount.
>
> Unless you absolutely, positively need the extra light a 2.8 aperture
> provides, I find it very hard to justify the extra cost of the 2.8 300mm
> over the 4.5 300mm.

Which 300/4.5 do I have? It must be the F. Mine has a tripod mount, and is 
wonderfully small, smaller than my FA200/4 macro.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to