Glen Tortorella wrote: > Toralf, > > I do have two 50mm lenses already, but I may be interested in your A > 50/1.7. I see you say it is in "nice" condition. I am new to the > list, and so can you be more precise? Do you have both caps for it? Actually, I was referring to the general quality of some of these lenses - which is something most people here usually know about. It seems like I forgot to say something about the condition of the ones I'm (possibly) selling. But they all look quite all right. Definitely used, but no scratches on the glass or bad marks on the bodies. And yes, I do have both caps.
But, I suddenly realise I need to take a closer look at the aperture ring on A-50 (which is the weak spot on these designs.) > > Where are you located? > Norway > Regards, > Glen > > On Sep 7, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: > > >> I'm thinking about selling some Pentax equipment that I don't use >> much. >> Not sure I'll actually be able to part with it, but I will at least >> mention it here and see if there's any interest at all. The items >> are... >> >> 1. FA 100-300/4.7-5.8 >> 2. M150/3.5 >> 3. A50/1.7 or M50/1.7, if anyone will consider paying anything >> at all >> for another 50... >> 4. Takumar-A 2X teleconverter. >> >> I haven't really decided on prices yet, so if you're interested, just >> make an offer. >> >> Everyone knows how nice all of this is, right? So I don't have to >> describe any of it? >> >> Besides perhaps the 100-300 - I think I should point out that this is >> not that horrible "power zoom" thing, but a newer design that's also >> "consumer grade", but still much better than the older variant. >> >> - Toralf >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
