Resizing seems to be a problem with my system. Details look fine at full magnification, but really become degraded when I save for the web.
Tim Øsleby wrote: > http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=331054 (I forgot the > link in previous post. Sorry about that) > > This is an interesting comment Peter. > And coming from you makes it even more intersting. This, because I have many > times found your renderings a bit odd. There are detailes in them, but my > eye has trouble reading them, if you get the general idea. > Either you and I see things very differently, or we have very different > monitors. Or, perhaps a third alternative? I'dunno. Do you, or others? > > This said. There are differenses in the renderings a my monitor too, but not > as big as your comment suggests. > I know that I don't have a superb monitor. It's an old tired CTR, but it > _is_ callibrated, and the blacks seem pretty good after callibration. > This puzzles me, a lot. > > I think I'll ask the rest of the crew. Do you see what Peter does here? If > many does, then I deffinatly need to do something with my setup. > > Tim Typo > Moslty Harmless > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 4:54 PM > Subject: Re: PESO Challenger (unreversed, b&w and colour version) > > > Seems you really did a lot of work on the revised version, since I see > no detail at all in the unrevised version... > > Tim Øsleby wrote: > >> First thanks for all commenteds. >> Raving positive comments, less positive and negative are all appreciated. >> Positive makes me fell good, and negative kickes me further. >> >> Bruce and Charles expressed curiosoty about the unreversed splashes. How >> it >> looked before reversing them. >> Here is the colour version, and a a b&w version, both with unreversed >> splashes. Just click at the thumbs below the image. >> I've reversed second and third splash, but IMO it's the third that makes >> the >> differense. >> >> As I said. I'm not convinced this is the perfect rendering. I had troubles >> smoothening the water, without making the bird disappear in the shadows. >> All >> tonal, cropping and sharpening work are done within Lightroom. Only the >> reversing part in Elements. >> >> So ideas are very appreciated. >> >> Tim Typo >> Mostly Harmless >> >> >> >> > > > -- Remember, it’s pillage then burn. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
