Same is true for me, Rod. Ya' wonder if it's their monitors or a jaded acid view much the same as calloused eardrums requiring the sound be turned too loud.
Jack --- Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 13/09/2007, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I got the impression they're supposed to look like that to give an > > accurate rendition of the light. > > I'd love to know what everyone else is using to view these images or > whether it's just the expectations that images like this have to be > over-saturated? > > We have a very successfully Landscape photographer here, all his > prints are completely over the top with saturation too and I've been > to a lot of the spots where he has made shots (in good light) and > they > just don't look like he prints them; > > http://www.kenduncan.com/gallery.php > > Confused. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
