P. J. Alling wrote: >Ann, I'd definitely go with the original photos. In my opinion >posterization is used mostly to save uninteresting and or poorly exposed >photographs. In this case you don't have either problem. I also think it >works better on color images with subjects that require little detail to >start with. > thanks, Peter (and Paul and....) I think I'm leaning toward trashing the posterization... however I may use a touch of it to give a bit more contrast to HUMBLE... the original was pretty flat .
ann > >ann sanfedele wrote: > > >>http://annsan.smugmug.com/gallery/2538600 >> >>36 thumbs here.... the first 12 most of you know -- they are in my book >>ad first calendar, >>the second set are 12 more from the book -- the third tier of 12 are >>files I posterized in >>photoshop of the second 12.... I can't decide if they work.... >>do you like em better than the non posterized ones? >> >>Each image here would be as it would appear on a calendar page -- black >>background is part of it.... >> >>I fell into this because I started working on the cover and couldn't get >>it to be snappy enough.... >> >>My house guest arrives tomorrow afternoon and the tounrey starts >>tomorrow night so I won't be >>around here much... >> >>Obviously I'm not wildly enthused about my conversions or I'd not ask -- >>some I like a lot, I think, >>but would people just as soon look at the original "real" photos or like >>the conversions better? bearing in >>mind I'm putting them on cafepress to peddle... >> >>thanks for any impressions, yay or nay - >> >>ann >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
