They're not really cameras anymore. They're optical computers. We think of the LX as a camera circa 1980. We should think of the latest crop of digital cameras as circa 10:30 AM.
Regards, Bob... -------------------------------------------------------- "Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection." -Jean Luc Godard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >On 10/20/07, Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2. Nobody knows the size of the MF based digital camera market as no one > > is > > really selling any. > >So what makes you think Pentax can do any better than Hassleblad, >Maymia, Leaf etc? > >If no one is really selling any now, and the size of the potential >market is unknown, isn't it a risky move to develop a product that may >not sell in any great numbers? > >Also, why is everyone assuming that the 645D will be so much cheaper >than the current products on the market? Have to say it: >Also, why is everyone assuming that the 645D will be so much cheaper >than the current products on the market? Look at the K10D. :-) While I appreciate the low price, it's got to be hard to make money on a body that depreciates by 50% in one year. It makes me wonder if they are still in the production line. Some of the stores selling at $999 would probably have to lose money selling at $699. I saw an *ist D online yesterday for $1299! In fact at $699 - $100 rebate, I'd expect the K10D to outsell the K100's. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.