At 10:55 12.11.2001 -0500, Mafud wrote: >In a message dated 11/12/01 5:53:49 AM Eastern Standard Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >> The thing is my originals are 4x5" slides, scanned with a quality scanner :-) >> Printouts with the same printer from a (current technology) digital camera >> file >> would not be very nice. >> >That makes your comparison more than invidious, comparing 4 x 5 ~slides~ as >the source image to that of dinky-digital cameras. Moreover, your statement >actually brings you down on the side of chemical to digital imaging rather >than pure digital to digital output.
Hmm.. I thought we were discussing the differences between a digital print and a wet print from negative/positive film original, at least the last arguments have been about this !? In any case, I think I've stirred this thread enough already :-) Antti-Pekka --- * Antti-Pekka Virjonen * Fiskarsinkatu 7 D * GSM: +358 400 789753 * * Computec Oy Turku * FIN-20750 Turku Finland * Fax: +358 2 413 7777 * - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
