On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Mike Johnston wrote: > However, I'd like it to be understood that from me it's not a challenge. I'd > just like to hear their honest reactions to the prints. For instance, does > it look better or worse than the prints Shel and Juan saw in the camera > shop?
It will look better, for sure. I'm in with a Piezo print, too. I don't think I want to compare them to wet prints, since I think they have their own strenghts. Tonality is one. Their alleged archival qualities is another, combined with the ease of production is another. Not to speak about the possibility of using a lot of different surfaces. BTW, I have a show coming early next year in San Francisco, and plan to show piezo prints only, mostly 11x14, mostly Tri-X scanned with a Polaroid SS4000 at 4000 dpi. I'll let you guys know, so the Bay Area people can take a look. j -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Juan J. Buhler | Sr. FX Animator @ PDI | Photos at http://www.jbuhler.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
