I believe the Super-Tak 300mm f/4 takes 77mm filter and the one mentioned takes 58mm filters
ppro > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill D. Casselberry > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tele-Takumar 300 f6.3 > > > > Paul wrote: > > > It takes a smaller filter if memory serves correctly, and other > > than that, everything that Mike Steele said is true! > > I'm sure the filter is smaller, my 1963 version 300mm f4 > Takumar takes 82mm filters! I have the matching 200mm f5.6 > Tele-Takumar (my first Pentax lens @ US$50 w/ case, hood&caps) > and it is a nice sharp lens. Also a pre-set, w/ 49mm filters. > > Bill > > --------------------------------------------------------- > Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast > > http://www.orednet.org/~bcasselb > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------- > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
