Thanks for that tidbit. I found it strange that the lens was so light. When I get home I will have to look at the specs of the 300 f/4 Takumar and compare.
I do not see myself using the lens much, but then again you never know. But there was no way I was going to walk away from it. It looks great attached to a camera. I may just put it on a tripod with my Spotmatic or S1a and just have it standing in the living room. Ahhhh, the advantages of being single.... César Matamoros II Panama City, Florida in Hollywood, Florida > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul M. Provencher [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 6:08 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Tele-Takumar 300 f6.3 > > The lens was billed as a price-advantaged, compact alternative to the 300 > f/4 Takumar and was sold at the same time as the Super > Takumar. It takes a smaller filter if memory serves correctly, and other > than that, everything that Mike Steele said is true! > > ppro > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Steele > > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 11:16 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Tele-Takumar 300 f6.3 > > > > > > > > Hi Cesar, > > You are correct. The lens is called a "pre-set" lens. > > I suppose it is a step back from "automatic aperture" > > lenses, in that it is a manual process, but I kind of > > enjoy it. It does require a slower, more deliberate > > approach to photography....but then if you have an SV > > (as I do)...you already know that! Enjoy! Mike > > Steele > > > > --- "Matamoros, Cesar A." > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > To keep a long story short... I was in a store on > > > Sunday that is an > > > antique mall. One store front with numerous > > > vendors. A few vendors had > > > some old cameras. One had a Ricoh with a Pentax-A > > > 50/2 on it. > > > > > > This same vendor had a Tele-Takumar 300mm f 6.3 > > > with caps, hood, > > > case and tripod mount. I returned to inspect it > > > yesterday. I could not > > > turn it down. It is not mint. Probabloy paid too > > > much. It shows some use > > > but is clean. I have already put it on the SV to > > > check its operational > > > feel. I probably will not be able to try it with > > > film until I get down to > > > Miami. > > > > > > I also put it on an adapter and tried it on an LX. > > > A totally > > > different feel than the A* 300/4. I am assuming > > > that the one ring sets the > > > working aperture and the other sets it once you are > > > done focusing. Is this > > > correct? > > > > > > Just had to tell someone, > > > > > > Cesar > > > > > > P.S. Any thoughts on this lens? > > > - - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .