On Nov 23, 2007, at 16:52, David Savage wrote: > On Nov 24, 2007 2:50 AM, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Stan Halpin wrote: >> >>> All of which is to say that, while I agree with Mark that we do >>> recognize and observe others at a grosser level of detail, it is >>> also >>> true that we recognize and are uncomfortable at some unconscious >>> level when there is less detail than we are able to discern in real >>> life. We can cope with a softened portrait and may even find it >>> pleasing, but we recognize that it is an artificial representation. >> >> I can think of a good example of overdoing the lack of detail in >> portraits: Remember those scary-looking Photoshop jobs of girls with >> big eyes, unnaturally plastic-looking skin, etc? Discussed on the >> list >> some time ago. Anyone got the link? > > The infamous Becky Carter: > > <http://beckycarter.com/> >
Oh god, that's depressing to look at. Does ANYbody think that looks good? -Charles -- Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
