Better, but still not one of your best. Rick
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Based on your and Paul's responses, and studying the > photo a bit > further, what I think works is to soften the > intensity of the large > dark twig by a bit to reduce its weight in the > scene. That achieves > the idea I had in mind. > > I've replaced the original with a revision... > > > http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48b.htm > > Further comments invited, of course. > > Thanks for all your comments! :-) > > best, > Godfrey > > > On Nov 25, 2007, at 9:44 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > > seriously - the darkest thing in the photo is > blurry - and it is on > > the > > right... so it kinda leaps out at you. > > if the foreground twigs had been blurry and the > large twig sharp it > > perhaps might have worked ... > > For me it isn't that you used shallow DOF, but > that what was not in > > focus overwhelmed the rest. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
