I'm not wild about multiple exposures when they're used to achieve a surreal effect, although there can be situations where that kind of image is appropriate. But when the technique is used to extend the dynamic range of the camera to more closely approximate the eye I find that it's most often a plus, sometimes a game saver. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Nov 30, 2007, at 10:18, Bruce Dayton wrote: > > > Always good to reply to yourself. It is interesting to note that > > several have commented on the foreground being murky. On my monitor > > it is dark, but just fine - no murkiness - I can see the details. > > Now my monitor is > > calibrated and I don't know about any others. > > I didn't think it was too dark either. I mean, it was darker than the > background, but otherwise fine. > > The dynamic compression (multiple exposures layered to make it all > work on one image) doesn't really "work" for me, though. It's kinda > blah. > > -Charles > > -- > Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Minneapolis, MN > http://charles.robinsontwins.org > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
