At 12:13 PM 4/12/2007, John Francis wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 08:27:59PM -0500, Mark Roberts wrote:
> > Cotty wrote:
> > >The median is about 3 years - I somehow thought this might be shorter.
> >
> > Oddly enough, despite DSLR's reputation for having a very short
> > lifespan, I find I'm updating my main camera no more often with digital
> > than I did with film (about 3 years) and that the amount I spend seems
> > to hover around $1000.00.
> >
> > I went from PZ-1p to MZ-S to ist-D to K10D
> > (OK, the Pz-1p was around $600.00, but after *that* the triannual
> > expenditure leveled off ;-)
>
>Me too.  In fact the PZ-1p purchase was pretty expensive, because
>that was also when I first picked up some AF lenses (including the
>28-105 zoom that's still doing sterling service).  And the *ist D
>was even worse - $1695 for the body, and $200 or so for the grip.


Not me.

My first Pentax SLR was the Z/PZ-20 that I got in the early - mid 90's. It 
served me well until I upgraded to the *istD in 2004.

Cheers,

Dave 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to