I probably wouldn't go less than that, unless meteors are just blazing and you think you've got enough in the frame. :-) (i hope i hope)
Tom C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "aimcompute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:09 PM Subject: Re: Leonid meteor shower could be truly spectacular > If you saw the aurora pictures and saw the stars, these three pictures were > shot at f2.8 for thirty seconds. > > http://www.peaceoflight.com/skyfire.htm > http://www.peaceoflight.com/moodlites.htm > http://www.peaceoflight.com/zerohour.htm > > Tom C. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Nosal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 11:38 AM > Subject: RE: Leonid meteor shower could be truly spectacular > > > > At 01:13 PM 11/16/01 -0500, you wrote: > > >which brings up my question: > > > > > >What is the minimum exposure for 400 speed slide film at f2.8 that I > should > > >use to photograph the meteors? I know that I can go pretty long and will > > >get star trails which is fine but I'd like to know the minimum shutter > > >speed. > > > > > >Thanks! > > > > > >Christian Skofteland > > > > See: > > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/meteor.htm > > > > --mike > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
