I agree. It is a bit more telephoto than I think is good for a normal lens, however. If I really need "normal", I use my DA 40 2.8 or the high end of my FA 20-35. Form what I've heard, the FA 35 2.0 is nice but hard to find.
>>> "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/12/2007 10:38 AM >>> On Dec 13, 2007 12:32 AM, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > My 43 limited unfortunately is no longer with me after than > unsuccessful drop in the airport. I am now on the hunt for the > replacement lens. Suppose the money is not an option, my choices are: > > 1. Brand new 43 lim (rebate is at large) > 2. Brand new 50/1.4 (I do want more speed) and it is cheaper too > 3. Second hand A50/1.2 (more expensive, MF, but faster still). > > What do you suggest? > > I never really owned 50/1.4 though... I'd suggest going for the 50mm f1.4. It's good value and it performs very well. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. !SIG:476001c4275241838835158! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
