On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:54:05 -0500, Christian wrote
> Boris Liberman wrote:
> > Talking to self though I am not mad, really.
> > 
> > I've got both 31 and 77 limited lenses so that it is not exactly the 
> > standard lens I am after. It is exactly what it is - the replacement for 
> > 43 ltd that unfortunately expired. So I think FA 50/1.4 would be a 
> > reasonable choice...
> > 
> > Any other opinions will be greatly appreciated.
> > 
> > Boris
> >
> 
> I'd go for another 43 Ltd.  Might as well have the full limited set 
> again. :-)

Yes me too, it would be a shame to break the set, especially as the 43 is the 
least expensive Ltd to buy AFAIK.

John

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error 
please notify Carmel College
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems.

Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email 
attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any 
responsibility for viruses.

Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate 
content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel 
College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to