I agree. All I needed was another opinion. ;) Jack --- Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Davis wrote: > > Doug..OK I've given it a bit of depth and now I even imagine the > light > > is straighter. > > > > Jack > > > > Comments? > > > > http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=282 > > > > > > > > --- Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> I think you have the makings of a good composition here, but I'd > >> rotate it until the lighthouse is vertical. I might also increase > >> midrange brightness and contrast a bit. > >>> A nice oldie. > >>> -------------- Original message ---------------------- > >>> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>> This is about a 30 year old Ektar 125 ISO neg. Bruce's very > >> dramatic > >> > >>>> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=280 > >> I agree, Paul. I like the shot. Personally, I wouldn't have > noticed > >> > >> the "non verticality" if you hadn't mentioned it. It does appear > to > >> be > >> a little bit veiled though. > > Yep, the veil is gone now. > > -- > Thanks, > DougF (KG4LMZ) > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
