A lot of supposedly reliable places made a big deal about it, despite
everything else having been spec'd out the same way all along.

-Adam

On 1/9/08, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Really? This puzzles me.
> I've seen a couple of trustworthy D300 tests that made a lot of fuzz about
> Nikin higher specks than whats correct on the LCD. I could  be misinformed,
> though.
>
> Not that this is important for me. I'm sure D300 is great.
> Tim Typo
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 12:13 AM
> Subject: Re: Samsung GX-20 first glimpse.. Is this the new K20D ?
>
>
> Yes, but the others aren't really 230k pixels, but rather 1/3 of that.
> All LCD displays on cameras are specified by points or sub-pixels. The
> 922k display on the D3/D300/A700 has its pixels counted the same way
> as the 230k displays on other bodies.
>
> The 922x displays are 640x480, the 230k displays are 320x240. twice
> the pixels in each direction.
>
> -Adam
>
> On 1/9/08, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Nikon LCD is not really 922k.
> > It is about 300k x 3. 300k pix pr colour channel.
> > In other words, it is better, but not as much better as the specs
> > suggests.
> >
> > Tim Typo
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 8:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: Samsung GX-20 first glimpse.. Is this the new K20D ?
> >
> >
> > Hmm, if that's the same 2.7" LCD as the Sony A200, I'm disappointed.
> > The A200's 2.7" LCD is only 230k pixels and those low-res displays
> > make live view far less useful than the high-res displays on the D3 or
> > D300 (Which are sharp enough to determine critical focus on image
> > review or live view, the difference between the 922k pixel and 230k
> > pixel LCD's is VERY noticable). Nice to see the return of ISO3200,
> > although I suspect we're still going to be a stop under what the
> > competition is delivering (other than Canon). The D300 and A700 offer
> > ISO 6400, and I suspect the rumoured A500 and D90 will as well.
> >
> > Unless there's more to it than this I'm seeing a competent but
> > underwhelming update to the K10D. Not really interesting to me as an
> > upgrade to the K10D.
> >
> > -Adam
> >
> > On 1/9/08, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - 14,6 Megapiksler (CMOS sensor)
> > > - Optisk billedstabilisering (Image sensor shift mechanism)
> > > - Huset er motstandsdyktig mot regn, sand og støv
> > > - Dobbel støvfjerning på billedbrikken
> > > - Stor 2,7" LCD skjerm
> > > - Søkerbilde på LCD (Live View)
> > > - Ett- trykks RAW opptak
> > > - Følsomhet inntil 3200 ISO
> > > Veil pris ca. kr 9.995,-
> > >
> > > Translated
> > > - 14,6 Mp (CMOS sensor)
> > > - IS (Image sensor shift mechanism)
> > > - Resistant against rain, sand and dust
> > > - doble dust removment on sensor
> > > - Large 2,7" LCD skjerm
> > > - Live View
> > > - One- push RAW button
> > > - 3200 ISO
> > > USD 999 (My rough calculation)
> > > ------
> > >
> > > No ap stimulator ;-)
> > >
> > > Nothing about AF, fps, image processor etc.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Tim Typo
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Patrick Genovese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 7:33 PM
> > > Subject: Samsung GX-20 first glimpse.. Is this the new K20D ?
> > >
> > >
> > > > See here: http://www.aronsen.no/default.asp?ArtID=428
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Patrick Genovese
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > PDML@pdml.net
> > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> > > > follow the directions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1214 - Release Date:
> > > > 08.01.2008 13:38
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > PDML@pdml.net
> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> > > follow the directions.
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > M. Adam Maas
> > http://www.mawz.ca
> > Explorations of the City Around Us.
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> > follow the directions.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1214 - Release Date:
> > 08.01.2008
> > 13:38
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> > follow the directions.
> >
>
>
> --
> M. Adam Maas
> http://www.mawz.ca
> Explorations of the City Around Us.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.0/1216 - Release Date: 09.01.2008
> 10:16
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>


-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to