On Jan 10, 2008, at 9:11 AM, John Francis wrote: >> BTW, I have an iPod touch (the iPhone sans the phone part) and it >> has a >> 3.5-inch (diagonal) screen with 480-by-320-pixel resolution at 163 >> pixels per inch. It's really stunning, especially as a digital >> photo >> wallet. This is what I want on a camera. > > That was the one thing I felt was a bit disappointing about the > iTouch; > as a digital photo wallet, it wasn't as good as the high-end HP or > Dell > Pocket PCs which had a full VGA-resolution screen (640x480).
They might not be quite as big, but comparing them the iPod Touch and iPhone screens seem to present photos more nicely than the others I've seen. I think Apple's JPEG rendering and scaling engine is much more sophisticated. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
