Hi,

try it with another lens !
The viewfinder tells you the result of the calculation regarding the
incoming light and the aperture simulation resistor. If the closed aperture
is not according to the resistor value, the LX will control a different
shutter speed, because the final shutter speed is controlled after the
aperture closed and the shutter opened. I had this happen with one lens, but
the pictures came out OK ! That's one of the big advantages of the LX. 
If the problem remains also with another lens, I suppose the resistor of the
aperture simulation is not OK.
On the other hand your MZ-M gives the same metering. Are the pictures with
the MZ-M and this lens correct exposed ? But a real quotation would be only
possible with slide film, I think.

good luck for testing

regards
Bernd

Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
...
> In automatic mode and low speed, there is a difference
> between the speed indicated in the viewfinder and the
> actual speed when shooting (always lower when
> shooting, 1 or even 2 stops). I don't know if this
> happens in higher speeds, since I can't distinguish
> between 1/60 and 1/125. My tests are always around 1,
> 1/2, 1/4, 1/8... easy to differentiate by hearing it.
> So, my test are always in low light conditions and
> 'border line' situations, meaning, a little variation
> of the camera position changes the viewfinder
> indication.
> 
> Using my MZ-M in the same condition and same lens
> produces a similar reading, but it seems a more
> 'stable' indication, and there is no difference with
> the actual shooting speed (I know that it is a
> completely different technology, though). Also, the
> MZ-M has 1/2 stop steps.
> 
> IMPORTANT: I first tested without film but after I did
> it WITH an exposed film loaded. (because I have read
> that 'dry' shooting can produce this error). I also
> tried moving the ISO dial as indicated in Rob
> Studdert's web site, in case there is some dirt inside
> that produces a false reading.
> 
> Do you think there is something wrong?
> What kind of test can I made to make sure that I have
> to repair it?
> In case there is something broken, is it an expensive
> repair?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to