Yes, indeed. I should've thought of a similar idea myself... ;-)
Boris Bruce Dayton wrote: > Hello Boris, > > This is the basic way I determine: > > The method of determination of peer rejection vs. judges is based on > speed of rejection. For the past couple of months, the judges have > been taking 1-3 weeks to reject. Peer rejections are mostly within a > few days. So if something has sat there for a long time (more than a > week) and eventually gets rejected, that is most likely a judge. It > is also easier to tell if there are several submissions. So an > example would be that 10 are submitted. 7 of the are rejected within > two days. The remaining 3 sit there for 3 weeks and then are all > rejected at once. This would indicate that the 7 were peer > rejections and the 3 were judge rejections. Makes sense, no? > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
