So it seems the older F and FA lenses may have some fine tuning then. Wonder what the A lenses will do, i have more of them than F and FA ones.
I hope by adjusting my K10D i did not throw things out of wack. But then again i panic about things like that,:-) K20D will have to wait. I'm more interested in getting a good F2.8 or F4 zoom for the horse ring. I plan to make the K10D the mane camera if a lens comes out soon enough. However if i make money early on my shows, i might have enough for both Dave Dave On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've now adjusted focus for two of my lenses, the FA 50/1.4 and the > FA 35/2. The FA 35/2 came in at +2. The FA 50/1.4 came in at -3. So > it seems that it's more a matter of lens variation than camera > baseline. I haven't tested the DA lenses yet, but they appear to be > spot on in informal look sees. For adjustment I shoot a crisply > printed sheet off a tripod. I run the range from -6 to +6 in steps of > two. When I have the winner, I do one step in each direction. It only > take a few minutes. It makes me think that an overall adjustment is a > real compromise. Lens specific is great. Another big plus for this > camera. > Paul > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
