Op Fri, 04 Apr 2008 17:20:13 +0200 schreef P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'd love to optimize my lens collection, unfortunately it seem to have a > life of it's own. <grin> > Paul Stenquist wrote: >> The D300 may have better high ISO. Some of the testers seem to think >> so. Although, again, I don't know if they're setting noise reduction >> values in the K20. If they are, they never mention it. I think Adam >> said he found the D300 noise at high ISO comparable to that of the >> K20D. The D300 is certainly more expensive and probably a bit better >> built as a consequence. It doesn't have in-body shake reduction. That >> would be a stopper for me, as I depend on hand holding a lot with >> older lenses. In the end I suppose it's mostly a matter of which >> direction your kit will go. I think it's usually better to settle on >> one brand, so that you can optimize your lens selection. >> Paul >> On Apr 4, 2008, at 7:19 AM, David J Brooks wrote: >> >>> I'm now on the fence. >>> >>> K20D or trade in the D200 for the D300, which is supposed to have >>> better high iso. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Paul Stenquist >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> You're welcome. Ironically, some testers have failed to notice the >>>> improved high ISO performance. But none of them have said what value >>>> they set for High ISO NR in the setup menus. I have it on "Weak." I >>>> suspect if it's turned off, the 3200 noise would be fairly >>>> pronounced, but I have no inclination to experiment. >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> >>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:33 PM, Ken Waller wrote: >>>> >>>>> The apparent improved high ISO performance (thanks Paul) really >>>>> sold me, >>>>> otherwise I'm pretty sure I could have resisted. >>>>> >>>>> Kenneth Waller >>>>> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Cory Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> Subject: Is the K20D Popular? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I think most of us agreed that the K20 is an improvement over >>>>>> the K10 >>>>>> (right?) >>>>>> I'm curious about the sales. I have not found the new camera >>>>>> compelling >>>>>> me to forsake the K10 in nearly the same way that I needed the >>>>>> K10 to >>>>>> replace the *istD. I know some of you have made the switch, but I >>>>>> get >>>>>> the feeling that the K10 had more buzz. My totally unfounded gut >>>>>> feeling is that the K10's initial buzz lasted longer and was more >>>>>> widespread than that of the K20. I wonder if the sales bear that >>>>>> out. >>>>>> What do you guys think? >>>>>> >>>>>> CW >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>>>> and follow the directions. >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly >>>> above and follow the directions. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Equine Photography >>> www.caughtinmotion.com >>> http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ >>> Ontario Canada >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>> and follow the directions. >>> >> >> >> > > -- Ciao, Lucas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
