In a message dated 11/28/01 12:13:52 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> But it can hardly be used to selectively focus on one subject, with a > blurred background. It has strengths, it has weaknesses, just like any > other format. But the basic quality of the images is every bit comparable > to the best scan I can get using a 2820 dpi scanner and 35mm film. I find one thing that is a constant feature with quality taking (making?) instruments: as you point out, a camera with which the shooter cannot "blur" the background is no more than a sophisticated point and shoot*ps*. *ps*Again, for ~me~, an $800 P&S (yep, they make such a beast) which won't let me move the aperture, defeats the purpose of my making photos. ***a movable aperture make the difference in all formats. Mafud [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
