I traded my M 80-200 for an FA 80-320 (literally, albeit indirectly). I've never regretted it. Mind you, if I want an 80-200 I've still got one in my kit.
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:50:50PM +1000, Brian Walters wrote: > Yes, I'm using the FA 80-320 as well and have been impressed with it's > performance. I seem to recall a few other list members singing its > praises from time to time. > > > Cheers > > Brian > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Brian Walters > Western Sydney, Australia > http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ > > > > > On Thu, 01 May 2008 18:11:23 -0600, "Bran Everseeking" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Thu, 01 May 2008 23:42:36 +0200 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ralf R. Radermacher) wrote: > > > > > What about the ubiquitous F and FA xx-200 or xx-300 mm lenses? Any > > > other suggestions? 3rd party lenses? > > > > The FA 80-320 treats me well excepting the rotating front element. I > > understand this lens has a variation in quality as well. > > > > Bran > > > > -- > -- > > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
