I'd second what Carlos wrote below. I've had both 80-320 and 
80-200/4.7-5.6 lenses. I found the adequate but both having PF issues 
with my digital cameras. The F 70-210 seems to be better than both in 
this department. In fact, I think that F 70-210 is the best lens among 
its peers unless you want constant aperture and fast speed.

Boris

Carlos Royo wrote:
> I have had several Pentax telezooms. The F 70-210 mm. 4-5.6 that some 
> other people recommended is a sharp lens and an excellent choice. I also 
> had the FA 80-320 mm. 4.5-5.6. It isn't as good as the F 70-210, but it 
> is a really good performer too.
> 
> Now I have the FA* 80-200 mm. 2.8 and the F 80-200 mm. 4.7-5.6. If you 
> don't want to spend a lot of money, the F or FA 80-200 4.7-5.6 is 
> surprisingly good for a modest consumer zoom lens. It is very light and 
> small, doesn't change its length when zooming (it is an internal zoom 
> lens) and its minimum focus distance is 1.1 metres, and is optically 
> quite good, not as good the F 70-210 but on par with the FA 80-320. I 
> recommend the F version because it has a metal lens mount, not plastic 
> as the FA.
> 
> Carlos
> 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to