In a message dated 11/30/01 4:07:32 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Mike is perfectly right.
(SNIP) > BTW This has nothing to do with censorship but acting like a grown up. > > Pål > _______________________________________________________________ > > >The problem with that Mike, is that those kind of responses very quickly > >turn any list into hell. > (SNIP) > the list to something other than the list I > subscribed to and love, go ahead. It will just no longer be a list where I > want to hang out. > ______________________________________________________ Pål, I don't recall you or anyone coming to my defense when PDML members attacked ~me~ in ~on-topic~ posts. Day after weary day the attacks went on and... silence from the PDML or, when someone got p*ssed, the complainant complained about ~me~ defending myself. Already since I've been back, a number of PDML members have tried mightily to start a flame war with me. NOT ONE PDML member, including yourself, said one #%## W@ $%$##$ word to the provocateurs. But now you guys want to complain about what has been not even a "flame" war but an OT thread gone a little awry? Surely we must have order, but the complaints on this thread are disingenuous if not supercilious when you and others practice double standards. **When ~topical~ threads drone on and on, the postings wandering far afield, never even tangentially related to the thread heading, why isn't there a "whoa" called for them? OTs die of their own inertia and as has been suggested, ignore the thread. Mafud [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
